Guns and Political Protest

Recently some people have gone to these Town Hall Meetings toting guns. From all reports though most people are doing it legally. I ask what is the big deal? If I am remember correctly the right to bear arms in the defense of yourself and your country was one of our rights, right after that one that says I can say whatever I want, go to whatever church I want, and assemble with whom I want peacefully.

The second amendment is there to safe guard U.S. citizens in two ways. First, it is there so we can protect ourselves from others. The police cannot be with us all the time. When a person breaks into my house with malicious intent and the police or still five minutes away am I to stand by while a person is in my house? No, I can defend my life, liberty and property with whatever means necessary, a gun being the foremost protected by our founding fathers. Secondly, the second amendment is there to defend ourselves from a tyrannical government. Just as Thomas Jefferson said in the Declaration of Independence: "That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends [defending our unalienable rights], it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government.." If our fore fathers had not been armed to protect themselves then the Revolution would be dead in its tracks.

These rights do not come from the Constitution though, it is our God given right to defend ourselves. While he may sound a little nuts in this video, I think this explains the right in the second amendment:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_QjEL0uUgo


As a law abiding citizen it is my right to protect myself. What I find funny is how we want more control when it has not done a lick of difference. People who want to use guns illegally, generally get them through illegal means. To take away guns from law abiding citizen, who use them for their defense, gives the criminals an advantage.

These people at the protests, if they are law abiding citizens, should not be harassed, because they know how and when to use a gun. Just because you bring gun out in public does not mean your crazy, it means you know they can defend themselves and that is their right.

Nazis & the American Political Parties

Just the other day I saw the SPeaker of the House Nancy Pelosi say this about the people who have been protesting and asking questions about the National Health Care Reform bill (H.R. 3200).

ANd another Democrat calling the people coming to the meetings using "Brown Shirt" tactics (http://www.columbian.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090806/NEWS02/708069952). For those of you unaware, the Brown Shirts were the followers of members of Hitler's personal security force the SA. So in esenence through these two bit of evidence we see the Democratic leadership trying to brand the opposition as Nazi's. What they fail to understand is what the Nazi's actually stood for and against. Here is a refersher for those who are bad with history.

Well, the Nazis were against big business — they hated big business. They were insanely, irrationally against pollution. They had a whole bunch of make-work projects to keep people working. They were for abortion and euthanasia of the undesirables, and they were for cradle-to-grave nationalized healthcare. (this is an excerpt from a Rush Limbaugh broadcast that I took from the following news article: http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/pelosi_limbaush_swastikas/2009/08/07/245316.html).

So tell me again that I am facist or a Nazi when in all honest the platform of the Democratice National Committee, the President of the United States, the Speaker of the Hosue and the House Majority Leader are closer to the Nazi's than most conservatives.

Opener by Lost and Found

So I was listening to some music as I unpacked the new apartment Katie and I just moved into and decided to listen to Lost and Found. I found this song. I love it because it speaks so much to the how Christ's church has changed and fallen so far in these later days. It' called "Opener" by Lost and Found. Check them out at http://www.speedwood.com

I WENT TO MY CHURCH ON SUNDAY, JUST TO HEAR GOOD NEWS. AND I CONFESS IT'S BEEN YEARS MORE OR LESS SINCE I'VE WARMED THESE PEWS. I AM LOOKING FOR SOMETHING STRONGER THAN MY OWN LIFE THESE DAYS BUT THE CHURCH OF MY CHILDHOOD SEEMS LIKE THE YMCA.

EVERY SUNDAY IS JUST LIKE THE LAST, AS IF THE CHURCH HAS NO HISTORY AND THE PEOPLE HAVE NO PAST. WE JUST SING THE SONGS WE LIKE TO SING AND WE PREACH ABOUT THE NEWS AND WE THINK UP SOME NEW THING JUST TO FILL UP THE PEWS.

I WANT PALMS ON PALM SUNDAY, I WANT PENTECOST STILL TO BE RED, I WANT TO DRINK OF THE WINE AND EAT OF THE BREAD. BUT THEY STRIVE FOR ATTENDANCE WHILE I STARVE FOR TRANSCENDENCE, BUT I COUNT AMONG THIS BODY BOTH THE LIVING AND THE DEAD.

WHETHER ITS GUITARS AND AMPS AND VIDEO SCREENS AND CORDLESS MICS, OR INCENSE AND ROBES AND COPES AND CANDLE LIGHT. LET'S STOP ALL THE FIGHTING OVER WORDS AND WAYS AND TELL ABOUT JESUS LIKE IN THE GOOD OLD DAYS.

My Health Care Plan

With all the talk regarding health care in the last few weeks I decided to try and formulate my own. Now I do not believe health care is an issue that can be dealt with successfully at the national level. Due to the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution I feel states can do a better job of this than a broad national mandate. Here are the fundamental principles of my plan.

Required Employer Coverage
Employers must provide a all employees with a health insurance plan that has several coverage options (including dental and vision coverage) and the opportunity to opt out of the plan. Employers and employees will both contribute to the plan (the amount varies based on the coverage decided upon by the employee) but if a person decides to opt of of the plan they shall that money contributed by the employer will be returned to the employee as part of their general wag, to be taxed as usual. An employee can then use that money has he/she see fit, even putting that money towards the purchase of a different health care option that was not provided by the employer. If the employee uses that additional money towards health insurance outside of the employer's plan(s) then that money will be tax deductible through the tax code.

Patient & Doctor Choice
Patients, along with their doctors, are the final decision makers on ALL medical decisions. No bureaucracy in ether the health insurance company, the government or the hospital administrators can refuse a patient treatment for their conditions. A patient should be allowed to see the doctor of their choice, at the hospital of their choice, for the treatment of their choice for their medical conditions. A doctor and hospital is there to diagnose and provide the range of options treatments for a patient. Patient decides on the path of their treatment.

Universal Coverage
A persona's health insurance plan covers them across all health care forms of health care practitioners and all locations.

Premium Buy Back
A person who has purchased a health insurance plan via their employer or in the marketplace may be entitled to a return of their paid premiums if their claims do not equal the amount paid by the consumer. For example, I pay $15,000/year in my insurance premiums, but only make $1,000 worth of claims. At the end of my current policy term, I receive the difference in those premium payments and the claims against my policy.

Government Health Insurance
The government may but is not required provide an alternative health insurance plan for those who choose to opt out of employer plans or are unemployed, but must follow the same regulation as provided for private health insurance companies. People who choose to use the government plan(s) will have their premiums for their chosen plan(s) be deducted from their paychecks. Only those using the government option will pay for the government option. No tax dollars will be taken from other citizens to fund their health insurance.

Medical Malpractice Lawsuits
All medical malpractice civil lawsuits against doctors shall be forwarded to an unbiased medical board to determine if the hospital or the doctors in question were liable for the death or issues at question in the lawsuit before being transferred to civil courts for litigation. The board must decide unanimously that the doctor or hospital was guilty of negligence in each case. Settlements or awards in medical malpractice lawsuits shall be limited to monetary damages to fix any negligent work of the doctor(s) and any time lost because of such negligence.

I am sure there are some issues I failed to address, but I a sure you all will bring them up and allow me a chance to deal with them. Thanks for listening and have a nice day.

AJB

Principles of Liberty

The following principles have been discovered using over 150 volumes of the Founding Father's original writings, minutes, letters, biographies and other primary documents distilled into the "The 5000 Year Leap by W. Cleon Skousen published by the National Center for Constitutional Studies in 1981. These are the principles of liberty that shaped and formed our unique republic. For a more through discussion of these principles check out the following blog: http://912projectbookreports.blogspot.com/

1. The only reliable basis for sound gonverment and just human relations is Natural Law.
2. A free people cannot survive under a republican constitution unless they remain virtuous and morally strong.
3. The most promising method of securing a virtuous and morally stable people is to elect virtuous leaders.
4. Without religion the government of a free people cannot be maintained.
5. All things were created by God, therefore upon Him all mankind are equally dependent, and to him they are equally responsible.
6. All men are created equal.
7. The proper role of government is to protect equal rights, not provide equal things.
8. Men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.
9. To protect man's rights, God had revealed certain principles of divine law.
10. The God-given right to govern is vested in the sovereign authority to the whole people.
11. The majority of the people may alter or abolish a government which as become tyrannical.
12. The United States of America shall be a republic.
13. A constitution should be structured to permanently protect the people from the human frailties of their rulers.
14. Life and liberty are secure only so long as the right of property is secure.
15. The highest level of prosperity occurs when there is a free market economy and a minimum of government regulations.
16. The government should be separated into three branches: legislative, executive and judicial.
17. A system of checks and balances should be adopted to prevent the abuse of power.
18. The unalienable rights of the people are most likely to be preserved if the principles of government are set forth in a written constitution.
19. Only limited and carefully defined powers should be delegated to government, all others being retained by the people.
20. Efficiency and dispatch require government to operate according to the will of the majority, but constitutional provisions must be made to protect the rights of the minority.
21. Strong local government is the keystone to preserving human freedom.
22. A free people should be governed by law and not by the whims of men.
23. A free society cannot survive as a republic without a broad program of general education.
24. A free people cannot survive unless they stay strong.
25. "Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations: entangling alliances with none."
26. The core unit which determines the strength of any society is the family; therefore, the government should foster and protect its integrity.
27. The burden of debt is as destructive to freedom as subjugation by conquest.
28. The United States has a manifest destiny to be an example and blessing to the entire human race.
    

Questions for Sotomayor

So President Obama has made his nomination for the Supreme Court to replace the retiring David Souter. He has chosen to appoint one Sonia Sotamayor from the 2nd Circuit court of federal appeals. The shit has already hit the fan with her regarding serveral quotes and things she has said including her judicial record. If I were a senator here are the questions I would ask her in the Judiciary Committee, in no particular order.

• What is the proper role and function of a Supreme Court and its judges?
• How do you explain that 60% of your decision at the 2nd circuit have been overruled by the U.S. Supreme Court? What does that say about your knowledge about fundamental law and the application of jurisprudance?
• How do you interpret the idea of "equal protection under the law" in the 14th Amendment? What place, if any, do "special circumstances," like race, gender, sexual orientation, have in determining discrimination cases in the eyes of applying equal protection under the law?
• How would you characterize your relationship with the political organization of La Raza?
  
• Please explain what you meant in the following quote: "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

While I know this nomination will probably not be stopped or prevented there are some serious issues to contend with on this nomination. The Congress, including both parties, need to throughly question and vet her for her life time appointment.

What I find interesting is how minority status, ethic group or race, only is a benefit if the person is a liberal or appointed by liberals. Where was the praise for Clarence Thomas when he was appointed? Or for Roberto Gonzales? It just seems to me that we have followed the opposite of King's dream (Being judged by the content of your character as opposed to the color of your skin). It seems with her nomination, the color of her skin seemed to matter more than her character. They focused on her race and gender than her record. Even the dems are doing that, saying Reps. should be careful to vote against the hispanic nomination. RACE SHOULD NOT MATTER AT ALL for good or for bad!!!

Focus on her record, which gives plenty of thought provoking questions. THEN focus on her character which she has revealed in quotes and assocations.

Everyone should take their time and not cave into thoughts of bipartisanship or the hurried schedule of President Obama.

Memorial Day

This weekend is Memorial day. I would ask any and all who read this blog to take a few moments out of your weekend to honor those men and women who gave their lives so that we can enjoy the precious freedom we have in the United States. If you know someone who served in our military, call them up and thank them. If you see a soldier give them a hug.

Remember the blood soaked rags that covered the feet of the Continental Army during their march to Trenton in 1777. Remember soldiers who held up the flag at Fort McHenry during the War of 1812. Remember the Alamo! Remember the 23,000 men who died at Antiem in one day and the thousands at Gettysburg to make the dream of freedom a realization for all people in the U.S. Remember the Maine! Remember those soldiers who blood soaked the sand at NOrmandy and the Pacific islands red to free the world from tyrany and others from death. Remember the soldiers who fought so that another 30 million people in the world could live under the freedom we have enjoyed for so long.

God bless our military and the men and women who serve. God bless the families of these men and women; protect them and sustain them in these times.

Pround son of a military veteran,

Adam J. Bulava

U.S. Government Curriculum

Hello fellow readers,

This year I have been a part of reorganizing and reissuing the social studies curriculum in the Clark County School District. Its been a fun, some what stressful and frustrating process but good. In preparation for my work on the social studies curriculum I created my own personal U.S. Government curriculum. It is posted below. Here are some key features to the curriculum.

• It is meant to be taught by following the U.S. Constitution from beginning to end. Teachers should have that as reference to everything they teach in the majority of this curriculum
• I include the least important items last since they are not mentioned in the Constitution and that they are more governmental theory than governmental fact.

U.S. Government Constitutional Curriculum

1. Importance / Goals of U.S. Government (Preamble) - 5 Objective
   Identify and give examples of functions of a government in society.
   Identify and describe the structures and features of different forms of governments.
   Identify the structure and major features of the U.S. Constitution.
   Explain and give examples of basic principles of the U.S. Constitution.
   Assess careers related to government.
2. Structure of Legislative Branch (Article I, Sections 1-3) - 4 Objectives
   Illustrate the structure and major features of the U.S. Congress.
   Identify the qualifications and terms of members of the U.S. Congress.
   List the responsibilities & privileges of Congressional members and Congressional leaders.
   Identify the members of the congressional delegation for our state.
3. Congressional Powers (Article I, Sections 4-10) - 3 Objectives
   Give examples of the expressed and implied powers of the U.S. Congress.
   Identify and describe the non-legislative powers of the U.S. Congress.
   Summarize the impeachment process of the U.S. government.
4. Law-making (Article I, Section 7) - 2 Objectives
   Describe the major steps in the law making process in the U.S. Congress.
   Evaluate the job of committees in the law making process.
5. The President & the Executive Branch (Article II) - 6 Objectives
   Identify the qualifications, terms, and privileges of the president.
   Evaluate the electoral college system.
   Describe the roles, responsibilities, and powers of the president
   Investigate the budgetary process of the federal government.
   Evaluate the confirmation process of presidential appointees.
   Categorize the components and responsibilities of the executive branch and the federal bureaucracy.
6. The Judicial Branch (Article III) - 7 Objectives
   Illustrate the structure of the federal courts.
   Explain the jurisdiction of the federal courts.
   Describe the origins of judicial review.
   List the major steps for a case to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court.
   Identify the nine justices on the U.S. Supreme Court.
   Evaluate the factors involved in judicial nominations.
   Describe acts of treason and its punishments from the U.S. Constitution.
7. Federalism (Article IV) - 4 Objectives
   Compare and contrast reserved, delegated and concurrent powers of the federal & state governments.
   Identify and describe the obligations of the federal government to the states.
   Identify and described the obligations of the states governments to each other.
   Explore issues, court cases, and/or current events related to federalism.
8. State & Local Government Subunit - 5 Objectives
   Compare & contrast the structure of the U.S. Constitution to the state constitution.
   Compare & contrast the structure/processes/powers of the federal and state legislative branches.
   Compare & contrast the responsibility/power of chief executive in the federal and state governments
   Compare & contrast the structure/jurisdiction/processes of the federal and state courts
   Compare & contrast forms of local government
9. Amendments Process (Article V & Constitutional Amendments) - 3 Objectives
   Describe the processes for amending the U.S. Constitution.
   Identify/evaluate rights protected within the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
   Explain and evaluate the importance of the remaining Amendments.
10. Supremacy of the Constitution (Article VI) - 3 Objectives
    Explain the Supremacy Clause in the U.S. Constitution.
    Examine the roles and responsibilities of citizens at local, state, and national levels.
    Identify and evaluate the symbols of the United States.
11. Ratification (Article VII) - 3 Objectives
    Explain the major historical events, documents, people, societies, principles and/or ideas that influenced that creation of the U.S. Constitution.
    Explain the compromises made during the creation of the U.S. Constitution.
    Describe the arguments made by the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists.
12. Election Processes - 3 Objectives
    Explain the major steps to being elected to a political office.
    Describe the role/power/responsibility of political parties, mass media, propaganda, public opinion polls, non-voters and/or other various influences on elections in the U.S.
    Identify the qualifications to vote in the U.S.
13. Political Parties - 4 Objectives
    Identify and describe the characteristics and functions of political parties.
    List political parties, both major and minor, found in the U.S.
    Compare & contrast political platforms of different political parties in the U.S.
    Describe and evaluate the processes of political socialization in the U.S.
14. Public Policy - 6 Objectives
    Explain the major steps in the formation of public policy.
    Compare and contrast domestic and foreign policy.
    Evaluate the role of political parties, mass media, public opinion, citizens and other various influences on public policy.
    Compare and contrast different types of domestic policy.
    Explain various strategies and instruments used in foreign policy.
    Examine the role of international organizations on foreign and domestic policy in the U.S.
15. Government Skills - Assessed throughout the entire school year.
    Develop vocabulary related to the study of government.
    Defend oral and written positions on government topics and current events.
    Develop and evaluate questions from multiple perspectives and thinking levels.
    Work individually and in groups to acquire and present information.

Hate Speech, PC, Tolerance & Free Speech

The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 (H.R. 1913). I understand the concept of hate crime; a person commits a crime that was motivated by their hatred for a specific group of people, enacted in the wake of the murder of Matthew Shepard. My main problem with these laws though is it does not provide the equal protection under the law provided in the 14th amendment. It classifies certain groups of people specifically minorities and others as deserving more protection than others. Unfortunately, they never classify it as a hate crime when a hispanic or black kills a white or hispanic or black because they don't like them. There is no equal protection under the law in these cases. This is just the foundation for what I would really like to talk about.

Hate Speech is officially fall under the enforcement of this law. So you cannot speak against a person if they are of a protected minority, like a Black or homosexual or as the they added, a pedophile. If you speak hateful words of these people you can be tried by federal law. But what is hate speech. If I were to go to church and they were to read from any book of the BIble that condemn homosexuality as a sin, does my pastor get arrested? Is my religious belief and political belief hateful if I think illegals should come to the U.S. by lawful means? Will they shut down church because they are sponsoring "hate speech" which is part of their religious belief, therefore violating the free exercise clause of the 1st amendment. This is the first step in the censoring of America. Or so it would seem.

Over the last 10-15 years the PC (politically correct) police have been all over everyone who says something that is not popular or just offensive. If you say something that someone else does not agree with then you are intolerant. But if I can't say it and you won't listen you are being intolerant to me as well. Much like Perez Hilton and Miss California. He asked an honest question; she gave an honest answer. He then proceeds to act as intolerant of her as he claims she is to homosexuals.

I refue to be PC but I will be tolerant of everyone's view point, even if I don't agree with. That is what makes the U.S. great. That is the definition of free speech. Being tolerant of everyone's view point no matter how stupid the view point. Free speech was not meant to protect the popular or polite speech but the offensive. Its to protect the hate mongering homophobic racists, as well as the hate mongering liberal homosexual that open disrupt religious practice in a church. It is the job of the informed and intelligent citizen to call out and/or ignore the ignorant on both sides.

This law, the political atmospher, the recent attacks on conservative talk show hosts like Rush Limbaugh and Michael Savage are the opening salvo against our most important and hallowed rights of freedom.

On a side note, I am becoming more and more libertarian in my view points, especially in this regard of free speech and expression. I don't think any speech should be regulate by the government. It can be seditions, hateful, vulgar, or offesive, even on TV. The Neilsens do a good job of telling us what is coming up on TV. If I don't want to hear vulgar langauge, I will vote with my remote. Also I don't disagree with regulating seditions hateful speech because again, the first amendment protects the offensive word and expression, not the polite. It is though the job of the government to regulate the actions of people. A man makes a seditions or hateful speech, they should probably investigate him to make sure he has not done anything beyond just speech.

Anyway, that's enough for now.

Liberal Media & MSNBC

What ticks me off most about the main stream media, but specifically the media outlets that have distinctly and unapologetically liberal in their bias is how they cover news. The main culprit is MSNBC. Every time I watch them it just ticks me off even more. From Rachel Maddow, Chris "Thrill up my leg" Matthews or Keith Olberman they all seem to follow the same pattern. If you don't understand it, make fun of it. Don't respond with arguments for your side, just tease and make fun and offer no analysis of the actual issue.

Now I will fully acknowledge that Fox News is a conservative news media outlet. But atleast they don;t just make fun of liberals. They debate with them and make talking points. They don't just tease Obama they say exactly why they are wrong. Totally different attitude, response, and outcome. If you look at the news ratings Fox has the highest ratings of all news outlets and the highest rated commentary shows from Bill O'Reily to my favorite of Glenn Beck. The fact that they have such high ratings says something about their message and the projection of that message.

Adam J. Bulava

Pirates

Here is my solution to the pirate problem in the Indian Ocean right now. Step #1 You move in a task force of the U.S. Navy and Marines; a few frigates, destroyers, aircraft carriers and patrol boats. You know enough to scare the crap out of these Islamic extremists. Step #2 The president gets on every single network and says that the pirates have 48 hours to return the captured ships and crews. If not every ship and port of call will be attacked by the U.S. military. Step #3 Wait 12 hours and then make a preemptive strike against all the pirate bases. I have a feeling when threatened they will start to kill and destroy all the people and ships in their possession, which is why you don't wait until the end of the deadline. Send in the Marines, Navy Seals, and the Army Rangers to take out theses bases capturing those responsible and saving the lives of those captured. Step #4 Any captured pirates are hung by the neck from the end of an air craft carrier. That aircraft carrier is then driven up and down the Somalia coast for a week or two as an example to anyone else who wants to try and be a pirate again. Problem solved!

Why do you think the Iranians gave up the American hostages on THE DAY Regan became president in 1981? Because they knew he would come in and use all force necessary to get them back. You can't negotiate with extremists they only understand and respect force. The U.S. has shown just how weak we are by negotiating with this scum. Who cares if we are not liked around the world. We never have been liked, but we have been respected. That is the more important of the two. Feel free to comment.

Adam J. Bulava

Teacher Merit Pay

Soooo... I found a few things that I actually agree with President Obama on. I know everyone is just shocked at that statement. Not surprisingly they are all education related. One of them is making the school year or day longer. I will address that one in a later post.

Today I want to focus on that President Obama wants to try and institute merit pay for teachers. I can fully get behind a plan that rewards teachers for being good teachers and identifies the bad teachers. This is something I talk about with my students when we discuss the bureaucracy in the federal government. One of the major features of a bureacracy is hiring, firing, and promotions based on a person's merit in their position. This is a set standard of objectives or criteria to determine who is best. We discuss as a class how would be judge teachers on a merit based pay system. Listed below is my system for merit pay for teachers. Enjoy and comment.

Evaluations

5-15% pay increase next year

• Administrators - based on four unannounced observations a year, at least once a quarter.
• Departments - dept. heads have to observe each teacher in the department at least once a quarter.
• Colleagues - each teacher in the building is assigned to observe another teacher in the school four times a year, at least once a quarter. Department heads are exempted from these because of their department observation.
• Students - Students are asked to evaluate their teacher’s anonymously each quarter, semester or when they transfer out of the class. Evaluations use a standardized questionnaire. Results given to administrators, teachers and parents.
• Parents - Parents are asked to evaluate their teacher’s anonymously each quarter, semester or when they transfer out of the class. Evaluations use a standardized questionnaire. Results given to administrators, teachers and parents.

Professional Development

5-10% pay increase the next year

• Based on degree, advancement in that degree and other forms of professional development taken in a set period of time outside of school
• Classes must be within your appropriate field for credit
• Reviewed on an annual basis during end of the year evaluations.

Experience
3-5% pay increase the next year

• Number of years teaching and subject matter
• Provides minimum amount of upgrade in pay (i.e. cost of living)
• Given if no other increase is earned for the next year

School Involvement
Paid during/after the completion of extra curricular activities

• Paid on an hourly rate or by a lump stipend
• Includes any after-school clubs, associations, school or district committees, etc

Teacher Salary Cap
Controls public spending of teacher salaries

• Teacher salary is capped at $???,???/year
• Annual Bonus system for teachers who continue to get good evaluations and continue their education

Teacher promotions to administration

• Minimum amount of time in district before apply to become an administrator
• Teacher’s / Administrators must provide evaluations from that minimum period when applying

28th Amendment

Here is my wish list of a Constitutional Amendment that should be passed. I know the people in Washington won't pass it so it is up to us in the States to do so with the power given to us in the U.S. Constitution: http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articlev.html

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof

The 28TH Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
To be passed by Constitutional Conventions in the several states... (Article V of the U.S. Constitution)

No member elected to the House of Representatives or the Senate shall serve more than two terms in their office. When a vacancy occurs within the Senate the governor of the state shall issue writs of election for the election of that office. No member of the House of Representative or Senate maybe appointed to ANY other position within the government while currently serving as a member of Congress.

Congress shall not pass any budget that is not balanced. ALL expenditure of the U.S. government must be accounted for in said budgets, including discretionary and nondiscretionary spending. No taxes shall be increased upon the electors unless it passes by a margin of 2/3 in both houses of Congress. No expenditure of the government shall be authorized unless it goes directly to support itself or the governments of the several states; no non-governmental group or agency may receive money from the government.

Congress may not vote themselves pay raises with direct approval of the electors of the several states in the next election. The pay of all representatives, senators, the president, judges and all government officials, shall not exceed more than three times the poverty line in the country as a whole. No benefits or privileges shall be given to Congress or any other elected or appointed officials unless approved by the electors of the several states, which shall include but not limited too health care benefits, retirement or pensions, and franking. All elected and appointed officials must also pay into social security.

No law shall be passed by Congress until it is released for all citizens to read and debate for at ten days prior to being voted upon by any house in Congress or signed by the President. All bills passed by Congress must include citations showing the expressed power to which this law is passed.

Facebook

So, I finally broke down and got a face book page. I hope that it ultimately leads more people to my blog and this blog will lead more people to my Facebook page. Well see though. Feel free to read and comment as long as no one takes it personal it will be all good.

Adam J. Bulava

Political Platform

Ok during the summer I mentioned a political platform that I was writing. After a conversation with my brother I decided I will post it. I thought I could just attach a file but I don't think this site lets me. So here it is in its entirety. Keep in mind this is a work in progress. I modify and change it from time to time. Enjoy!

My National Political Platform

Animal Rights
1. I do not believe animals have the same rights as human beings

2. I do not think animals raised for our consumption need to be treated inhumanely for the sake of profit. I support legislation that punishes companies that treat animals cruelly.

3. I do support animal testing for medical uses, but not for beauty products.

Banking
1. Passing legislation that punishes banks who give golden parachutes to CEO’s while their members lose their life savings

2. Disbanding the Federal Reserve Bank and putting its power and back in the hands of the banks to allow the free market to work.

3. Repealing the FIDC. but mandating that banks to have some form of depositor insurance on the deposits made in their bank.

Business
1. Encourage the return of jobs back to the U.S. by:
a. Lowering taxes on American companies doing business and manufacturing in the U.S.
b. Raising tariffs on goods coming from other nations, even if they are an American company

2. Enforcing policy that makes companies and/or individuals to pay restitution to any and all individuals victims of fraud/damages by that company and/or its products.

3. Lowering corporate income tax to encourage growth and job creation.

Crime & Punishment
1. I support the use of all rehabilitation methods used by prison to encourage and deter convicted criminals from returning to a life of crime.

2. Probation and parole should only be given to those criminals who are sincerely repentant for their actions. The states should provide support to ensure they do not return to their life of crime.

Discrimination
1. I will instruct HUD and the Justice Department to investigate and prosecute all claims and forms of housing and lending discrimination.

2. I will instruct the Labor & Justice Departments to investigate and prosecute all claims and forms of discrimination in our work force.
3. Racial profiling must stop in the U.S. I will support any reasonable method used by the states to investigate and prosecute this practice of local law enforcement offices.

4. I will instruct the Education and Justice Department to investigate and prosecute all claims and forms of discrimination in our schools.

Drugs
1. I support the rehabilitation of drug user before any jail time is given in a drug related crime.

2. Continued abusers will be sentences to prison and forced into a rehabilitation program inside during their incarceration.

Education
1. I will greatly reduce the size of the Department of Education, by only keeping open those areas that are of a vital interest to the federal government.

2. Return control over the education system back to the states and local governments.

3. Work with the states to establish a set of standardize requirements for a voluntary national teacher license that will be valid in all 50 states.

4. Reward school states, townships, districts and/or school who make significant improvements to their schools through standards set up by the individual states, districts and/or schools. Several areas to show improvement
a. Graduation rates
b. Attendance rates
c. Standardized test scores
d. Students going to college

5. Work with both the NEA and AFT to create an objective system of merit pay for teachers for any school district that choose to implement it.

6. It is my goal to repeal the No Child Left Behind Act.

Energy
1. Encourage Congress to pass legislation to make the U.S. less dependent on foreign oil, several options include:
a. Allowing for more domestic drilling (ANWAR, off-shore)
b. Increasing standards of fuel efficiency in our vehicles
c. Rewarding companies who create practical clean alternatives fuels and power resources

2. If Congress should decide to not lift the ban on known reserves of domestic oil I will provide amnesty to the companies that will explore, drill and pump that oil.
3. Continue to aggressively fund research for alternative, renewable and/or practical fuel sources.

4. Investing all tax dollar from energy sources to develop and implement an advanced domestic energy grid
a. Money from taxes on the gas will go to car manufacturers in order to research technology for cars to become extremely fuel efficient or not dependent on gasoline or diesel.
b. Money from taxes on power companies will go to them to research the technology behind batteries to store excess energy produced by solar, wind and other forms of renewable but sometimes unreliable sources
c. Taxes also will go to investigate and implement the moving the majority of power lines from above ground towers to below ground lines to prevent massive power outages

Environment
1. Supporting all methods of gathering natural resources that protect the natural beauty of this nation.

2. Work to create cleaner alternative fuels that are practical for our nation. (See energy policy)

3. I do not support the unequal enforcement of the Kyoto Treaty.

4. I support the controlled burning of National Parks to prevent destructive wild forest fires.

Executive Branch Reform
1. Elimination and reforming of many executive departments that have grown to large, cumbersome or repetitive, some changes include:
a. Combination of the Departments of Labor and Commerce into one Executive department
b. Disbanding the Department of Homeland Security while moving many of the agencies to the DOD.
c. Including the Department of Veteran Affairs into the DOD, to create a better system of assistance to our Military Veterans.
d. Combining the Departments of Transportation and Interior
e. Elimination of the Department of Education since it does not have clear a constitutional basis for its implementation

2. Elimination or moving of several offices in the EOP, and independent agencies to department level positions.
a. OBM, CTCF, SEC, FTC, FDIC, moves to the Department of the Treasury
b.

Family
1. Providing benefits to homosexual and heterosexual families that stay faithful to each other and their children.

2. Provide educational resources to new and struggling families in a variety of areas

Foreign Trade
1. I will increase tariffs on ANY and ALL goods imported to the United States.

2. Any goods shipped to the U.S. that are below the standards required by the U.S. will have the following consequences:
a. Increased tarriffs to that country and/or company to cover the expenses of inspecting these products
b. Inspection of all goods from that country and/or company until proven up to U.S. standards.

3. Repeal all free trade agreements with other nations, but provide beneficial tariffs to allies and other nations.

Foreign Policy
1. All monetary and military assistance to countries will cease, unless the country or its problems are an eminent threat to the U.S. and its citizens.
a. The U.S. cannot solve the problems of the world by throwing money or the military at them
b. Encouraging non-profit organizations and American corporation to devote private fund to handle these problems and the making sure money is used wisely.

2. I will restrict my travel outside of the U.S. unless it is for something that is vitally important to our nation’s continued existence and/or prosperity.

3. I will act as a unbiased and impartial party to any countries willing to solve their problems diplomatically.

4. I will actively peaceful solutions to various areas of the world, specifically:
a. Between North and South Korea
b. Between Israel and the Palestinian people
c. Between Israel and the other nations of the Middle East
d. Between China and Taiwan and the people of Tibet
e. Between Indian and Pakistan

5. Any country attempting to explore, drill and pump oil within 250 miles of our coast line needs to seek permission to do so. The building such infrastructure inside out coastal territory will be seek as a hostile act and will be destroyed.

Government Financing
1. Over haul the U.S. tax code and the IRS to move the U.S. to a flat tax system.

2. Lowering and/or repealing forms of taxes to ensure all citizens are taxed equally and fairly.

3. Cut spending the in federal budget by several methods
a. Limiting ear marked appropriations. Any legislation containing ear marked appropriations that does not fit a national interest will be vetoed.
b. Cutting foreign aid (See foreign aid for more details)
c. Freezing all federal budgets during my term as president.
d. Working with Congress and my Cabinet to cut and reduce spending by taking a hard look at the Federal Budget.
e. Altering and/or reducing parts of the federal bureaucracy to make them more efficient and productive

4. All budget surpluses will be funneled to paying off the any and all national debts.

Homosexual Issues
1. I do not support a marriage amendment to the U.S. Constitution, this is state issue. The issue of same sex marriage lies solely in the hands of the state. While I do not encourage same sex marriage, it is in the hands of the people and legislatures of the state to decide on this issue.

2. Use my power as President to ensure Full faith and credit is given across state lines in issues regarding same-sex marriages. Along with this I will plan to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, as it is blatantly unconstitutional.

3. I support civil unions and other legally binding agreements that give homosexual couples comparable legal binding status and rights as married couples, such as the right of attorney, comparable tax benefits, etc.

4. I have no official position on adoption of children by homosexual couples. I will support the states on how they decide this issue.

5. I will work to repeal the “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy of the U.S. military.

Immigration
1. Enforcing immigration legislation already on the books, before any new legislation is written.

2. Securing our borders with additional boarder patrol agents and a possible border fence

3. Loosening the requirements, quotas, and delays for becoming citizens or getting temporary work visas to enter the country.
4. Open more places along the boarder to allow for the quicker dissemination of immigrants into our country legally, hopefully in the larger borders towns and spreading to more if needed.

5. Supporting states that refuse public services to any and all immigrants who cannot prove their legal status here in the U.S.

6. Refusing to give ANY federal aid to any person who cannot prove that they are hear legally.

7. Granting more powers to local law and federal enforcement officers to penalize business and individual who willingly and/or knowingly hire illegal immigrants.

8. Any illegal immigrants within the federal prison system will be held for a set period of time before being released back to the their country of origin for continued incarceration and/or rehabilitation.
a. Those accused of misdemeanors will be automatically deported.
b. Those accused of felonies will be tried, if convicted they will serve jail time here and then be deported. Those not convicted will automatically be deported.

9. The National Guard will be used to supplement border patrol agents in critical areas of our nations border, if needed.

10. Prosecuting local majors, police and other officials who decide to ignore and make their cities, sanctuary cities.

Individual Rights
1. I support the right of citizens of the U.S. to own and use guns responsibly. I object to any extremely restrictive gun control laws that prevent law abiding responsible citizens from owning a gun for their own enjoyment and/or protection. I support harsher punishments for gun crimes, especially when guns are obtained by illegal means.

2. I will support an increased stipend used to provide well qualified lawyers to criminal defendants who cannot afford one in both federal and state courts in an attempt to counteract possible discrimination in all U.S. courts.

3. I support a constitutional amendment reforming the electoral college to the district plan.

4. I support the death penalty but only in cases where the defendant has shown no remorse for his crime. I support limiting the appeals of a defendant on death row. I support the enforcing of the death penalty upon the last unsuccessful appeal of the jailed defendant.

5. I do not support the right to abortion on demand. I will support restricting abortions only in cases of rape, incest, and where the mother’s life is in danger. I will support programs that assist teenage mothers to care a baby to term, if they give it up for adoption, since they are not prepared to care for that child.

6. I do not support the right of a person to commit euthanasia and/or physician assisted suicide.

7. I support a constitutional amendment banning the burning of the U.S. flags.

Insurance
1. I do not intend to create a Universal and/or Socialized Insurance system in the U.S.

2. Congress should pass legislation deal with the following issues regarding the Insurance system in the U.S.
a. Give control to the patient and the doctor make all decisions regard treatment in health care, not a board at the HMO.

b. Allow for the free market system of the U.S. to work to citizens advantage when finding health care, by allowing people to purchase policies across state lines in all forms of insurance.

c. Provide the option of a government run insurance system, where costs will be deducted from a citizen’s pay, but not tax those citizens not drawing on system.

Legislation
1. Ask for Congress to create a Select committee to review the U.S. Code of Law. The goal would be to repeal and remove any legislation that is not longer practical and/or necessary for the running of this country and/or that goes beyond the power granted to the government as found in the U.S. Constitution. Also to simplify the language of the U.S. Code of Law.

2. I will sequester Congress in the capital until such time as they complete the work required of them by the citizens. I will use the force of the National Guard if necessary.

3. The Vice-President will act as my liaison to the U.S. Congress informing me of the day to day actions of the Congress. Any silly delays by the Congress in doing their necessary business will lead to their sequestering until such time as they pass legislation “necessary and proper” for the running of this country.

4. Veto Power
a. I will veto any legislation that is not necessary or proper to the country as a whole, not just to an individual person and/or group of people.
b. I will veto any legislation that broadens and/or goes beyond the powers given to the U.S. government as is found in the U.S. Constitution.
c. I will veto any legislation that does not have a plan provided for how they will fund and enforce this new law.
d. I will veto any federal budget that is not balanced.
e. I will veto any bill with ear marked appropriations that are not for the good of the nation as a whole.
f. I will veto any bill that has not been read by Congress or is overly long and complex in its language or enforcement.

Military
1. It is my goal during my term to withdraw all U.S. military troops from nonessential bases and locations around the world.
a. As bases close around the world, troops will be stationed to critical areas where they are needed as describe below and/or they will return to the U.S. and act as the first line of defense for this country from within our own borders.
b. Any bases created with the intent to protect Western Europe from the threat of the former USSR will be the first to go. Our intent there was to deter the spread of communism, that goal has been attained. Our soldier need to come home and the land returned to their native countries.
c. Soldiers and bases in the Eastern Asia will also be closed, barring one exception, South Korea. Japan has a strong enough defense force to stop invaders and can call upon the U.S. if so requested.
d. Soldiers will remain stationed in South Korea while I work diplomatically with those two countries to cement a permanent peace agreement or a plan for the reunification of their people.
e. Bases will continue to operate in both Iraq and Afghanistan to stabilize the region with the wars we have fought in their countries until their own military forces can handle the load by themselves. As each country experiences success and additional responsibilities, more troops will come home permanently and the bases will be given to those people.

2. It is my goal to seek the highest number of benefits for both currently serving and former soldiers of this nation in any way possible. I will not cut ANY benefits to the defenders of our nation; instead I will seek to expand funding to the military benefits, in the areas of medical coverage, education and pay.

3. I will continue to fund weapons research but will only give money to U.S. based weapon companies and will secure in their contracts with the U.S. military branches the sole ownership of all technologies produced from such research. It is my goal that the U.S. be able to build all its military hardware within our own borders, that we should never have to use this technology and that no other nation have access to this technology.

Social Security
1. I intend to cut off social security, upon consultation with the Congress and my Cabinet, to a specific birth year. All those born after that will need to seek other methods of providing for themselves when they decide to retire. There will be no more retirement benefits to people after that.

2. I will provide educational resources for those people not covered by social security to prepare them adequately for their retirement.

3. I will give up to the states the power to create their own social security systems to protect their citizens as they see fit.

Terrorism
1. The U.S. Military in conjunction with the CIA, NSA, and other intelligence gathering department and with the Justice Department will conduct a intensive search for any and all terrorist organization that threaten the U.S. Their first target is Osama bin Laden and other high ranking members of Al Quade to be charged, convicted and punished for their involvement in terrorist attacks on U.S. citizens

2. Any countries willingly and knowingly harboring terrorists, will be considered enemies of the U.S. All diplomatic, economic and governmental ties with those countries will be cut out. All attacks on the U.S. shown to have originating from those countries will be dealt with on the harshest and swiftest means available.

3. Any countries combating terrorism may call on the U.S. for assistance in capturing these terrorists to be prosecuted in their countries of origin. Any assistance must be funded by the countries seeking assistance.

Unions
1. I support the right of private and public of workers to unionize or to negotiate individually with their employers for better pay and/or benefits.

2. Public employees do not have the right to strike unless there is an immediate threat to their safety or continued economic well being by remaining on the job. I do not support any public employees striking just to get an increased salary.

3. I will work with the leaders of large national unions in an effort to help adapt unions to the needs of the 21ST century without harming former and current union members or the businesses they work that employ them.

Welfare
1. I intend to review current welfare policy in the U.S. to see what changes need to be made in legislation and enforcement of this policy.

2. I support limited federal welfare, which has a limited time frame of use, until a person has found employment.

The Four Horsemen

Not a long post today. Many people who study the last book of the Bible, Revalation, and try to predict and interpret the signs and passages of that book must be having a field day right now. I know most of what is in that book was written to address the people living in the Roman Empire during parts of its persecution of Christians. I also know though that the prophecies of Jeremiah, Isisah, Ezekiel and others were interpreted first for the current day and then reflected on the future. The same could be said for the book of Revelation. With that being said, it is scary to see the interpreted signs from Revalation coming about in the modern era.

If anyone has read the "Left Behind" series or any interpretations of Revelation they know it will start with an attack on Israel. This is becoming a larger and larger threat. There was a lot of unrest in the Arab with their invasion of Gaza. Russia has moved war ships to Syria. Iran has enough nuclear material to make a nuclear bomb and has said it wants to wipe Israel off the map. I can literally see in my life time a situation where Gog and Magog (Biblical names of Russia and Persia; i.e. Iran) attacking Israel. This is not speculation but seeing the signs of the times.

There are some many signs that seem to be showing the end of the world, at least in Biblical interpretation is coming. Everyone should remember though, that God is in control. He will watch over His people. Even if we are persecuted and we have a crown of glory awaiting us in heaven. But in this time Christians need to work all the harder to proclaim their faith and not hide in the basement.

God bless.

My Declaration of Independence

I keep hearing more about this stimulus package and the crap that is shoved into this sandwich of a bill. I keep hearing how our elected leaders refuse to listen to the people. I feel very much like our founding fathers during the thirteen years that led us to the American Revolutionary War. We keep asking them to stop treating like we are their servants instead of brothers and fellow citizens. With that in mind a few weeks ago I started working on this document posted below. It is tailored and stolen from our founding fathers, edit and updated for the 21st century. Discuss and enjoy!

Adam J. Bulava
-----
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all people are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of property. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience has shown that men are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these fifty states and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present Congress, President and Supreme Court of the United States is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.–

They have refused to pass laws protecting the borders and citizens of the United States from immigrants and terrorist threats from all corners of globe.
They have obstructed the administration of justice to be given too all people equally regardless of political persuasion, class or celebrity status.
They have failed to protect the lives of those yet unborn in the United States and abroad by encouraging and funding a culture of death with tax payer money.
They have erected a multitude of offices and sent their officers to harass our citizens and prevent them from practicing their natural rights.
They have worked with other nations to make us subject their rules and denying our nation and its citizens its own sovereignty powers and natural rights among the nations and powers on the earth.
They consistently have spent money beyond the revenues provided to the state by its citizens and spent them on projects that do not promote the general welfare of all citizens.
They have attempted to subvert the first amendment rights of free speech, press and association through standard of balance and/or fairness.
They have used fear and intimidation in order to pass permanent legislation that does not promote the common good, the general welfare of all citizens or for the common defense of our nation and its citizens.
They have protected or added ill-conceived enumerated rights of criminals, immigrants, immoral deviants and other classes of while failing to protect the natural and civil rights of ordinary citizens of this nation.
They have overstepped their Constitutional bounds by enacting laws that are neither expressly permitted in the Constitution or that are necessary or proper to the execution of those powers, while ignoring and defeating laws are genuinely necessary and proper to the execution of the rights of U.S. citizens.
They have not allowed open and honest debate and conversation on vital and controversial legislative issues. Instead they have added them to bills in the dead of night to be passed for the good of the nation.
They have divided us by the means of divisive and partisan political parties, while vilifying each other through biased media outlets.
They have passed laws are that enforced on the citizens of this nation but not applied to themselves.
They have encourage the illegal immigration of peoples from all corners to be used as virtual slave within the industries of the U.S.
They have taken our from our property to distribute it to those who refuse to work, those failed, to solve the problems of nations all over the globe, and in opposition to the natural rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of property.–

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions, phone calls, emails and letters have been unanswered. A government, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our elected leaders. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by this government to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the God of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these states, solemnly publish and declare, That these States are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the U.S. Congress, its President and Supreme Court, and that all political connection between them and this government, is and ought to be totally altered — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of God’s Divine Providence, I mutually pledge to my fellow citizens my Life, our Fortune, and my sacred Honor.

Spendulus Package

I am angry, very angry! Why is it that our politicians, specifically very liberal Democrats and some moderate Republicans think that we spend our way out of this recession/depression? Why? Does that work for anyone else? If I am in debt, like the U.S. is, should I just keep spending until I am out of debt or until I find a job? I don't think that works, it only makes my situation worse. That is what the United States is doing right now. We are trying to spend our way out of this recession. What does work to get out of a depression? Well what works on Main Street should work on 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Here is what reasonable people do when they are in financial trouble.

They cut back on their expenses and unnecessary costs. They get rid of their cable TV and or Internet. They don't go out to dinner as much. They turn off their heat and AC. Reasonable people do not SPEND MORE!!!

Makes no sense to me. God help the United States. I have only just begun to love her and I am seeing her being sold away from me due to the ignorance and stupidity of our elected leaders. I wish I could say more but I cannot put it into words.

Peace.

Dedicated to the Democrats

This post is dedicated to the 188 Congressmen who this week voted against the chosen one's spending (not stimulus) package. While the voting was primarily along party lines, there were 11 people I would like specially recogized. These 11 people are the democrats who chose to vote against their party. I only hope the Republicans and a few Democrats can hold off the vote as long as possible in the Senate with a filibuster. We don't need $825 Billion spent in ways that will not create jobs. But here is to the Democrats:
Allen Boyd (FL-23)
Bobby Bright (AL-2)
Jim Cooper (TN-5)
Brad Ellsworth (IN-8)
Parker Griffith (AL-5)
Paul Kanjorski (PA-11)
Frank Kratovil (MD-1)
Walter Minnick (ID-1)
Collin Peterson (MN-7)
Heath Schuler (NC-11)
Gene Taylor (MS-4)
Also, Dean Heller (R-NV-2) - Thanks Dean since I knew we couldn't count on Berkley and Titus to do that right thing.

Have a good day everyone.

Protecting Life

In his last days in office President Bush made this day, the anniversary of the Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade as National Right to Life Day. So today I want to address this case my stance on abortion.

In Roe v. Wade it did not give abortion on demand, as many people may think. It basically limited the state's rights to limit abortions based on a trimester schedule. It was later adapted by another case to say that as long as the baby can survive outside the womb then the state has a viable interest in protecting the life of the child.

One issue I have with this is on a constitutional basis. Under the 14th amendment all people who are citizens of the U.S. are entitled to equal protection under the law and may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property with due process. This phrasing leads to my interpretation that abortion goes against the Constitution in several ways:

1. Fetus and the unborn have not been given equal protection under the law in the U.S. If you kill them there is not punishment. If you kill the mother there is a punishment.
2. If we are lead to believe that its a privacy issue with the woman having the freedom of choice with her body, then what about the men. Technically the fetus is not the woman's body. It is genetically different from hers and just supported by her body. The fetus has 1/2 its genetic material from the man and the woman; therefore it is not the property of either of them but of both. When a woman aborts the child she is depriving the father of his genetic "property" in the child without due process.

I also look at this issue through the eyes of the Declaration of Independence and what Thomas Jefferson said in regards to the job of government. I have quoted the pertinent passages below:

...all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men... That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it...

It is the job of the government to protect the God given right of life. When the government allows abortions to continue they are not protecting the life created in the mother's womb. I will even go so far that life does begin at conception, when the man's sperm fertilized the woman's egg. At that point life is created, and created equal, deserving the same protection to be given by the government.

Abortion is the final option ONLY in extreme cirumstances. It is not birth control. People who cannot afford, or support kids have plenty of other options before them besides Abortion. There is adoption. Plenty of people cannot have babies. Give it to someone who can and is ready for a child. There is birth control for those who are married or living together. Also, there is abstinance. If you are a high schooler, that is the best thing for you. Children is the natural consequence to having sex, therefore if your not ready to have a kid, you probably should not be having sex, PERIOD!

I fear for the life of the unborn with our new President in office. God protect the little ones and give us the courage and the power to fight against these policies and encourage others that protect life. Amen

Semester #1... DONE!!!

Hello all,

Well today marked the halfway point of the school year. I finished with final exams today, at least giving them. Some still need to be graded and put into the computer for records but that does not take very long and will be done later this weekend. On reflection of this past few months I have had a number of successes that I will be taking with me into next semester and the remainder of my teaching career.

1. Smaller, more frequent, genuine summative assessments. I spent a lot of time this year working on smaller tests/quizzes that I gave my students instead of larger unit tests. This seemed to work out well for most students. Those who did not do so well had more chances to see where they went wrong and correct the errors before the end of the semester. The students also had a lot more genuine assessments. Instead of simple mutiple choice questions and other they had to explain and know the material to do well. It seemed to work well in the long run because my final exams in my honors government course had an average score of well over 80%.
2. Reading Assignments. I am trying to remember to pair my reading assignments with other things during class. Such as when I give a test/quiz in government I will be giving them a reading assignment to introduce our new topic. In Street Law I will do a case study and reading assignment in the same day. Honors still has them as homework assignments.
3. Essays. Working on doing more of those this semester. I still have not taken a lot of time in class to teach how to write an essay for my classes but I can try and fix that next year. Though with the amount of students who transfer into my classes during a semester that might be counter productive. Still something I want to try for next year.

Anyway, just some thoughts as I close out the first half of the school year. Have a nice day.

Random Political Thoughts

Occasionally I go to a website known as 411mania.com. They used to be all wrestling and then transferred over to all parts of pop culture and then finally added politics in the last two years or so. Unfortunately they are extremely biased to the left. I used to like to post comments on their boards but I don't think any of mine made it because its clear I am a independent conservative christian. But a few things got to me today that I saw on their site and I feel the need to respond.

1. The Gay Community Needs More Milk Posted by Jeff Clarke on 12.18.2008
http://www.411mania.com/politics/columns/92719/The-Gay-Community-Needs-More-Milk.htm#commenthere
The opening paragraph of this whole diatribe against people for Prop. 8 just as hate filled and bigoted as he claims I am since I do not support homosexual marriage. Here it is:

"Now, let's get something, pardon the pun, straight: If you voted for Prop 8, or supported it in any way, you are a bigoted homophobe, next case please. You can spout non-truths about protecting the children or defending church beliefs, but all your doing is dusting off the same tired arguments that opponents of interracial marriage and civil rights used before you, and you're the same class of small-minded racist that those people were. I'm sorry you have so little confidence in your heterosexual relationships that just seeing two married dudes will immediately make you join the pink mafia, but keep your personal failings out of my State Constitution, okay?"

I take extreme offense to the comments because it puts me in a class of people that I do not belong. Yes I don't think homosexuals have the right to marry but I am not a bigot or a homophobic. I think it would be really clear. I have lived in the same dorm room with a gay man. I have plenty of friends and colleagues who are gay and I am just fine with them.

Here is the bone of contention with on homosexual marriage. Marriage never has been in the scope of human history a right. It has always been controlled the state and the people. The state determines who is allowed to marry and who is not. They set requirements for what it means to be married in the marriage license. A right is something the government cannot take away but the state can take away the marriage relationship. They do it all the time; its called divorce.

Also the idea of our democracy is the rule of the majority through the philosophy of popular sovereignty. Homosexual marriage was voted down TWICE in California. If we allow a 2% minority to make the laws that affect the majority then we might as well be ruled by a fascist dictator that can kill us for thinking contrary to him. That is what it is that a lot of these extreme homosexual sound like: "If you don't believe we are right then you are a homophone and deserved to die." I support your right to protest and convince people to your side, but be a good winner and loser. You lost the election. It should be over and done. People with these extreme views try and say their side is right and when they lose through legal and proper elections they bitch and moan until they get it their way instead of bowing to the will of the majority.

Homosexuals have the same rights as the rest of the people in the U.S., if they didn't they would have been arrested for protesting or presenting petitions for the furthering of their privileges in our society. Please don't compare yourselves to the civil rights movement of the 1960's. Blacks did not have the right to vote, speak out, public or protest without being beat in the street or dogs attack them or hoses turned on them. It's not the same. Don't begrudge that they didn't support you in the your vote against Prop. 8. Blacks are very conservative when it comes to these things. That is their right to believe so.

I am sure I will speak on this again but issue #2.

2. The 10 Dumbest Political Moves of the Year Posted by Joe Rivett on 12.18.2008
http://www.411mania.com/politics/columns/92750/The-10-Dumbest-Political-Moves-of-the-Year.htm

This list is so biased its not even funny. Nothing about Democratic governor Rod Blagoiavich, nothing about Obama or Biden's gaffe's during the election. Eight of the ten on the list are Republicans. Some of them I would agree with others I wouldn't. I guess that is the point of Top Ten Lists. What gets me is how the liberals seem to think Palin was one the worst mistake of the campaign. They fail to see how she energized a political party not excited about its moderate centrist candidate. She is a true republican in all sense of the word and the only reason I voted for McCain. I thought she was and is the future of the Republican Party. She is able to excite the young and bring together the social, fiscal and religious conservatives. It was because of her that McCain won 48% of the vote. If he hadn't picked her I believe it would have been close to an electoral sweep.

But my real belief of the biggest political mistake in the campaign was Barak Obama not choosing Hilary Clinton as his running mate. Let's be honest that decision almost cost him the election. The media doesn't like to admit it but the election was closer than it should have been with Obama, but if he had picked Clinton he would have won in a landslide. His own pride and his wife seemed to be the big reasons why he did not pick her. Just plain dumb to not pick the person just as popular than you in the primaries. Just dumb.

One more point before I go: Obama's cabinet. People have been calling it a team of rivals. That's exactly what it is. That is his plan. He wants his rivals in the Cabinet and them to have ownership of his Presidency so they cannot challenge him in four years. Most of his major picks (Clinton, Richards, etc) would have a decent shot of challenging him in 2012 if his Presidency goes down the shitter. But he picked them so that they could not challenge him. Plus he talked about "Change" in his campaign but this cabinet shows more of the same than change. He has recycled most of Clinton's Cabinet.

Anyway, that's it for me. I think this is where I will do my political bitching from now it. It feels good.

Election 08

For everyone who is curious here is my stance so far on the election. Although I did caucus for Barak Obama in January, but after further review I found that he is not the candidate that I would vote for. I am proudly voting for the electors of John McCain and Sarah Palin. Here are the reasons why I am voting for McCain/Palin:

1. John McCain is the best choice for commander-in-chief of our country. He served years in the military during one of the most controversial military actions of this century. He was a POW and knows the true horrors of war. Because he knows those horrors he is the best man to know if and when to send our boys and girls into combat. While he was a POW he put other people and his nation first. He willing allowed the lower ranked soldiers to leave the POW camp before he would.
2. As much as people want to call him more of the same or Bush's third term, they don't know McCain. Yes he has voted 90% of the time with Bush, but if there was a democrat in the Oval Office would we begrudge a democrat who voted with that president. He is a Maverick of sorts because Bush and traditional has been angered at McCain when he took stances against him.
3. Sarah Palin is a proven reformer. She took on her own Republican Party in the state of Alaska and cleaned it up. I know she has only has limited executive experience, but she has more executive experience than any other person on the ticket. I also feel that she is the future of the conservative movement that will challenge John McCain if and when he needs to be kicked in the butt.
4. He understands the true threat of Islamo-facism.

I do not think that I should vote to vote against someone, like voting for the lesser of two evils, but here are the reasons I am voting against Barak Obama.

1. Experience: I agree a person should have some experience before going into the highest office of the country, but if your trying change the nation, why do you want someone with a lot of experience. Beside what experience does Obama have that would help him lead in the roles the president serves under. Commander-in-chief: Never served a day in the military. Chief Diplomat: He would meet with the president of Iran. A man that has said many times "Death to America." He cannot be negotiated with. Chief of State: He represents us to the world. While he is friends with people who seem to hate America (William Ayers, Rev. Wright). Chief Legislator: How can a man who has not made a solid stance on any legislative issue in the U.S. Senate or the Illinois Senate. He has voted present on almost every single vote. Chief Executive: What executive experience does he have? Community organizer does not mean he knows how to run a company or even the largest economy and powerful nation in the earth. Judicial Roles: This is chiefly for appointing judges. There is not much experience you can show with this, but he has been against Bush's appointments mostly for political reasons.
2. Judgement: The experience argument really does not mean much of anything. It is better to judge a candidate based on his/her judgement. Look at Barrak Obama's. He stayed 20 years in a church with an Anti-American pastor that follows unbiblical theology and preaches anti-Americanism. He is friends with a man who bombed the Pentagon as part of the Weather Underground, a terrorist organization (He only got off on a technicality). He is self-professed friends with blatant Marxist and socialist.
3. Socialism: He is a socialist and a Marxist. He believes in bigger government and I don't. With universal health care and other programs he would expand the size of our government.
4. Taxes: He says he is against taxes but would raise taxes in almost every single area of our country, hurting our all ready ailing economy.
5. Reaching across the aisle: He claims to be a person who can and will reach across the aisle to come up with common solutions but has no proven record of doing so. In fact he is THE most liberal senator in the U.S. Senate. and he picked the 3rd most liberal senator to be his running mate. He has no intent to reach across the aisle. he can't agree with the right and no one on the right will agree with him.

And that is my arguments. Take it or leave it, biotches! A few months ago I came up with a political platform that I would run on if I was running for national office. I will post that in a few days. God bless and good luck.

"Yes we can!"

Ok, so another political posting. There is a speech by Barak Obama that was made either today or in the last few days that I am looking for. If I can find it in the next few minutes I will quote him word for word. Ok, here it is the quote:

We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times ... and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK.
(http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5h-wpxs1Re-8vx2Zk5xnYygW1W67w)

To that I answer, "YES WE CAN!" That is the key tenant of our capitalist economy and our great democracy that maybe Mr. Obama does not get. We have the choice to drive our SUVs or other cars as much as we want. The choice to keep our house as cool or hot as we want. We can make that choice because we choose to pay the price for those choices. We get to choose the 42' plasma over the 19' tube TV. You cannot make that choice for my Mr. Obama, no government has that right or power. To quote Jefferson, "that we are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Liberty is that choice. The pursuit of happiness and property (the original idea of Locke and Jefferson) is that choice.

Yes, I run my apartment warmer in the summer and cooler in the winter: Why? The cost of power is expensive and because own warm clothes and can endure the 120+ degrees of the Las Vegas summers (Sorry Katie, I will make sure I turn on the air for you this summer). But that is my choice. I choose to drive my car less because gas is expensive, not because the rest of the world says I have to. It is a matter of choice. That is the big idea that guides conservatives: choice and freedom.

I have the choice to discipline my kids the way I want to without the government getting involved (Unless, of course, there is genuine abuse, but spanking or slapping a child because they swear is not abuse). I have the choice to be successful and expand and get rich (High taxes will take away my choices to be more successful and keep me from striving higher). I have the choice to do bad and fail. It's my choice and I will not infringe on your choices or freedoms by asking you to bail me out when I fail because of MY CHOICES! When I fail and the government bails me out, I have taken your choices and freedoms because I have taken your tax dollars because of my choice. I have the choice to believe what I want about any topic and not get called a racist, homophobe or intolerant because I CHOOSE to believe something contrary to the minority. I give you the choice to believe what you want even if I disagree. I am an American and I don't like when my choices or freedom are taken away from me.

Same Sex Marriage Ruling in California

I know I have not posted in forever and that will probably change soon. I like topical rants, raves or just answering an interesting question. So I will probably start doing that soon, but since this showed up in the news today I can't stay quiet about it. I know this is going to get me grief from a lot of people if they decide to actually read my blog (I don't think there are tha many), but I really don't care. This news just broke today. Go ahead and read if you didn't know.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/la-me-gaymarriage16-2008may16,0,2982265.story

I am against homosexual marriage. Part of this is because of my religious faith, part of it comes from a logical view point. This post will deal with it more from the logical perspective, since my faith is my own. If you want to talk to me about the religious view point feel free to contact me through here. Let me start with a brief addendum though about my personal thoughts on homosexuality.

I know quite a few people who are gay and while I do not support the lifestyle, I am NOT a bigot. I DO NOT discriminate against them or treat them any different than my straight friends. I DO NOT think that they should be dragged out into the street and shoot for making this lifestyle choice. I DO NOT think they are second class citizens or that their rights should be taken away in any way, shape or form. (I do not believe marriage is a right, more on that later). I DO NOT think that they should be discriminated against in their professional or personal life because of their lifestyle choice.

I support civil unions and shared benefits for homosexual couples. I think a partner in a homosexual relationship has the right to make all legal and medical choices over the blood family, even if they don't have the legal power of attorney. They have the right to live their lifestyle as long as it does not interfere with mine. Unfortunately, some of the actions of the GLBT community consistently interfere with the lifestyles of others. I would say more on this but its not the point of my post. On with the arguments! Please keep and open mind.

1. It goes against natural law. Someone show me a homosexual animals in nature. You won't find any because they don't exist. One big reason if animals are gay they can't procreate and therefore die out. Nature has made sure they can't exist through that very through natural selection. It is an unnatural lifestyle.

2. It's a personal choice. Some people will make the argument that they have no choice to be gay; that they are born that way. While science has been able to prove that there is a genetic predisposition to homosexuality, that does not mean genetics is fate. If that were the case, I would be an alcoholic with cancer, since there is genetic predisposition to both of those problems. Plus, when people start talking about homosexuality as a lifestyle, your making a choice to live that way, just like I choose to lifestyle to be Christian.

3. The will of the majority vs. the rights of the minority. In California they passed a law several years ago to stop Gay marriage (prop. 22). The majority of the people in CA decided that they agreed with it. The will of the people has been spoken and must be respected. Gays are not discriminated against. The rights given to them in the U.S. Constitution and state constitutions are valid and enforcible. But there are people who will say marriage is a right... wrong! Next point. (Check out #7. separation of church and state for another aspect of the will of the majority, but from the religious side.)

4. The right to marry. There is no right to marry. It is found no where in the U.S. Constitution or in almost any state Constitution. Marriage is a privilege granted by the state to those people who fulfill the requirements set by that state in its law; just like driving. Those who do not meet the requirements set up by the state cannot marry. No one is above the law, not even homosexuals.

5. Cross Culture agreement. Looking at anthropology and sociology shows that homosexuality is something that is not accepted in almost ALL modern and ancient societies. There may have been allowance for people who lived like that, but they were not allowed to marry. Why? Because they cannot help continue the society and culture, because they can't procreate. Almost all culture have a homosexuality taboo just like the incest taboo. Redefining marriage from between and a man and woman to allowing same sex marriages go against every major culture and society. Even if those societies allowed polygamy, it was still between men and women, not women and women or men and men. There was no sexual access between the people of the same sex in those polygamous relationship. That is even the case in the Mormon church when they practiced polygamy (even though I guess the fundamentalists still do)

6. What's next? If we allow same sex marriages, what would be next? How do we redefine marriage then? This is the first step off a slippery slope that can lead to the entire destruction of marriage in general. What's next? Marriage between a man and two women or four? Marriage between a woman and her dog since she loves him (or her). Marriage between a man and his dead wife. You start here, where does it stop?

7. Separation of Church & State. Some people argue that by forcing a Judeo-Christian attitude on marriage is having the state endorsing or establishing a religion. The problem with that argument is that every single major religion has a ban or restriction on homosexuality, sometimes for the reasons up above. Its not just Jews and Christians, its Muslims, Hindu and the like; they disagree too. So ruling against Gay Marriage is not endorsing or establishing any religion, it is supporting the logical beliefs of them all. (The will of the majority yet again.) Oh and gay marriage is not a religion so don't say it's not allowing them the free exercise of religion. Besides, the government can regulate religious action, it did it with the Mormon polygamist years ago.


So that is my posting for today. I hope you all enjoyed. Have a great weekend.

AJBulava

New Job, New School, New Week

So, its been a few weeks; I knew this web-logging would not last entirely long without a break. Oh well, to bad so sad.

I got a new job at Canyon Springs High School in North Las Vegas. I am teaching three government courses, two Street Law courses and an American Politics course. Two of the course are honors classes, which is a new thing for me. I have taught government before but that was during Student teaching. Its been a stressful start of the year with three new preps for the school year but I have been handling it pretty well.

I am not sure what else to write for now. So talk to you all later.